Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Current Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pichler, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

‘Down-to-Earth’ Cosmopolitanism

Subjective and Objective Measurements of Cosmopolitanism in Survey Research

Florian Pichler

University of Surrey, UK, F.Pichler{at}surrey.ac.uk

People who see themselves as and feel citizens of the world are often regarded as cosmopolitans. Sociology further distinguishes cosmopolitans by a set of particular orientations to the greater world. According to major normative claims of cosmopolitan theory, cosmopolitans hold attitudes and beliefs recognizing diversity. They are also expected to be more open-minded, self-critical and future-oriented. Using data from the European Values Study (EVS), the article discusses the possibilities to operationalize two measurement approaches to cosmopolitanism. The first one, termed the ‘identity approach’, is based on self-views as a world citizen and feelings of belonging. The second, labelled ‘cosmopolitan orientation’, relates to particular attitudes towards difference. Analyses show that EVS data on the ‘identity approach’ are problematic. In a comparative crossnational study covering 31 European countries, it is found that individual-level characteristics (gender, age, social class, citizenship, etc.) and structural conditions (GDP, sociopolitical regime) impact on the objective measurement of ‘cosmopolitan orientation’. The results of a multilevel regression on this measure support the usefulness of approaching cosmopolitanism from a more ‘objective’ point of view.

Key Words: cosmopolitanism • Europe • European Values Study • identity • multilevel analysis

Current Sociology, Vol. 57, No. 5, 704-732 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0011392109337653


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?